-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deep copy improvements #46
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…t consisten in transpiled and native code
I would say this is ready for review. While i added ~300 tests in this PR, there are lots of test still to be added. However, to unblock downstream work i think this should be ready for at least a beta release, so let's get this merged and add more tests later |
for future reference, here is what is missing: #48 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's some commitment 💯
Is there any test case for a nested DynamicObj? If not, I think it would be a good mind-easer to have at least 3 very basic tests for this scenario:
- DynamicObj with Single field (e.g. string) in the DynamicObj to be copied
- DynamicObj with Single field (e.g. string) in ResizeArray in the DynamicObj to be copied
- DynamicObj with Single field (e.g. string) in Dictionary in the DynamicObj to be copied
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are the missing tests you referenced in #48?
This PR will